\item{atc_code}{a character or character vector with ATC code(s) of antibiotic(s)}
\item{property}{property of an ATC code. Valid values are \code{"ATC"}, \code{"Name"}, \code{"DDD"}, \code{"U"} (\code{"unit"}), \code{"Adm.R"}, \code{"Note"} and \code{groups}. For this last option, all hierarchical groups of an ATC code will be returned, see Examples.}
\item{administration}{type of administration when using \code{property = "Adm.R"}, see Details}
The \link[=lifecycle]{lifecycle} of this function is \strong{questioning}. This function might be no longer be optimal approach, or is it questionable whether this function should be in this \code{AMR} package at all.
On our website \url{https://msberends.github.io/AMR} you can find \href{https://msberends.github.io/AMR/articles/AMR.html}{a comprehensive tutorial} about how to conduct AMR analysis, the \href{https://msberends.github.io/AMR/reference}{complete documentation of all functions} (which reads a lot easier than here in R) and \href{https://msberends.github.io/AMR/articles/WHONET.html}{an example analysis using WHONET data}. As we would like to better understand the backgrounds and needs of our users, please \href{https://msberends.github.io/AMR/survey.html}{participate in our survey}!