From 60525877891f748cd3c4afc3266b69d0dd2db9b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: abc <abc@example.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:42:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mods

---
 presentation/pres03.tex | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/presentation/pres03.tex b/presentation/pres03.tex
index 8dca76c..8df4799 100755
--- a/presentation/pres03.tex
+++ b/presentation/pres03.tex
@@ -404,9 +404,18 @@ Experiments using synthetic data
 %\end{frame}
 %
 
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Numerical tests}
+\begin{center}
+Results
+\end{center}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+
 
 \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
+ \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 \footnotesize
 
 \onslide<1-> For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
@@ -415,14 +424,14 @@ Experiments using synthetic data
 \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
  \begin{center}
   \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_1.png}
-\caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
+\caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (\infty,120\%)$. $\vec{w} \times 200$}
  \end{center}
  \end{figure}
 
 \end{frame}
 
 \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
+ \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 \footnotesize
 
 For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
@@ -431,7 +440,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
  \begin{center}
   \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_2.png}
-  \caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
+  \caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (\infty,80\%)$. $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 %\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
  \end{center}
  \end{figure}
@@ -440,14 +449,14 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 
 
 \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
+ \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 \footnotesize
 For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 
 \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
  \begin{center}
   \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_3.png}
-  \caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
+  \caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (10 \ dB,120\%)$. $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$}
 %\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
  \end{center}
  \end{figure}
@@ -456,14 +465,14 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 
 
 \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
+ \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 \footnotesize
 For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 
 \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
  \begin{center}
   \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_4.png}
-  \caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
+  \caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (10 \ dB,80\%)$.  $\vec{w} \times 4$}
 %\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
  \end{center}
  \end{figure}
@@ -473,7 +482,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 
 
 \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
+ \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 \footnotesize
 
 \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
@@ -488,7 +497,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 
 
 \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
+ \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 \footnotesize
 
 \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
@@ -505,7 +514,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 
 
 \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
+ \frametitle{Undersampling}
 \footnotesize
 
 \begin{figure}[!hbtp]
@@ -520,20 +529,20 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 
 
 
-\begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
-\footnotesize
-
-\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
- \begin{center}
-  \includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth]{images/undersampling_press.png}
-\caption{ \footnotesize Different undersampling rates for the channel}
- \end{center}
- \end{figure}
-
-
-\end{frame}
-
+%\begin{frame}
+% \frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
+%\footnotesize
+%
+%\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
+% \begin{center}
+%  \includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth]{images/undersampling_press.png}
+%\caption{ \footnotesize Different undersampling rates for the channel}
+% \end{center}
+% \end{figure}
+%
+%
+%\end{frame}
+%