diff --git a/presentation/images/aorta_blender.png b/presentation/images/aorta_blender.png
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3cc3836
Binary files /dev/null and b/presentation/images/aorta_blender.png differ
diff --git a/presentation/pres03.tex b/presentation/pres03.tex
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..16d2cc1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/presentation/pres03.tex
@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
+\documentclass[xcolor=dvipsnames]{beamer}
+%\documentclass{beamer}
+\usepackage[english]{babel}
+%\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
+\usepackage{multicol} % indice en 2 columnas
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
+
+\usepackage{helvet}
+\usefonttheme{serif} 
+%\usepackage{ccfonts}     % Font family: Concrete Math
+\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
+
+%\usepackage{graphicx}
+%\usepackage{movie15}
+%\usepackage{media9}[2013/11/04]
+
+
+\usepackage{graphicx}
+\usepackage{multimedia}
+\usepackage{media9}
+
+%\usetheme{default}
+%\usetheme{AnnArbor}
+%\usetheme{Antibes}
+%\usetheme{Bergen}
+%\usetheme{Berkeley}
+%\usetheme{Berlin}
+%\usetheme{Boadilla}
+%\usetheme{CambridgeUS}
+%\usetheme{Copenhagen}
+%\usetheme{Darmstadt}
+%\usetheme{Dresden}
+%\usetheme{Frankfurt}
+%\usetheme{Goettingen}
+%\usetheme{Hannover}
+%\usetheme{Ilmenau}
+%\usetheme{JuanLesPins}
+%\usetheme{Luebeck}
+%\usetheme{Madrid}
+%\usetheme{Malmoe}
+%\usetheme{Marburg}
+%\usetheme{Montpellier}
+%\usetheme{PaloAlto}
+%\usetheme{Pittsburgh}
+%\usetheme{Rochester}
+%\usetheme{Singapore}
+%\usetheme{Szeged}
+\usetheme{Warsaw}
+
+%\usecolortheme{albatross}
+%\usecolortheme{beaver}
+%\usecolortheme{beetle}
+\usecolortheme{crane}
+%\usecolortheme{dolphin}
+%\usecolortheme{dove}
+%\usecolortheme{fly}
+%\usecolortheme{lily}
+%\usecolortheme{orchid}
+%\usecolortheme{rose}
+%\usecolortheme{seagull}
+%\usecolortheme{seahorse}
+%\usecolortheme{whale}
+%\usecolortheme{wolverine}
+
+%\useoutertheme{infolines}
+%\useoutertheme{miniframes}
+%\useoutertheme{sidebar}
+\useoutertheme{smoothbars}
+%\useoutertheme{shadow}
+%\useoutertheme{smoothtree}
+%\useoutertheme{split}
+%\useoutertheme{tree}
+
+
+\usepackage{amssymb,mathrsfs,amsmath,latexsym,amsthm,amsfonts}
+\useinnertheme{rectangles}
+
+
+\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{} % quitar simbolitos
+
+
+\setbeamerfont{page number in head/foot}{size=\large}
+\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]
+
+
+\title[A new mathematical model for verifying the Navier-Stokes compatibility of 4D flow MRI data]{ A new mathematical model for verifying the Navier-Stokes compatibility of 4D flow MRI data}
+%\author[Jeremías Garay Labra]
+%{Jeremías Garay Labra}
+\institute[University of Groningen]
+{
+Bernoulli Institute\\
+Faculty of Sciences and Engineering\\
+University of Groningen\\[0.5cm]
+ %\includegraphics[height=1.5cm]{Imagenes/escudoU2014.pdf}   
+  %  \includegraphics[height=1cm]{Imagenes/fcfm.png} \\[0.5cm]
+  \texttt{Jeremías Garay Labra \\ \ j.e.garay.labra@rug.nl}
+}
+\date{\today}
+
+
+\begin{document}
+\frame{\titlepage}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{Index}
+  \tableofcontents
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{4D flow MRI}
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{4D flow MRI}  
+ \begin{columns}[c] 
+\column{.55\textwidth} % Left column and width
+\footnotesize
+
+4D flow MRI has been shown potential in the assesment of blood flow dynamics in heart and large arteries, allowing wide variety of options for visualization and quantification. 
+
+\column{.5\textwidth} % Right column and width
+
+\end{columns}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+  \frametitle{4D flow MRI}
+\footnotesize
+
+Main limitation for its clinical applicability is the long scan times involved. Therefore, multiple strategies emerged in order to make acquisition faster>
+\begin{itemize}
+\item Navigator gating
+\item modest spatial resolutions $2.5 \times 2.5 \times 2.5 \ mm3$
+\item partial data coverage  
+\end{itemize}
+
+Typical quality estimators are> SNR, VNR, peak flows/velocities, mass conservation (zero divergence 
+
+We want to introduce a novel measure for quantify the quality of the 4D flow measurements, using the conservation of momentum of the flow.
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\section{The corrector field}
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{The corrector field}
+\begin{columns}[c] 
+\column{.6\textwidth} % Left column and width
+\footnotesize
+
+\onslide<1-> We assume a perfect velocity \begin{eqnarray*}
+\rho \frac{\partial \vec{u}}{\partial t} + \rho \big ( \vec{u}  \cdot \nabla \big) \vec{u} - \mu \Delta \vec{u} + \nabla p =  0 \quad \text{in} \quad \Omega \label{eq:NSmom}
+\end{eqnarray*}
+
+\onslide<2-> And a corrector field which 
+\begin{align}
+\vec{u}  & \approx   \vec{u}_{meas} + \vec{w} \quad \text{in} \quad \Omega \label{eq:corrector} \\
+\nabla \cdot \vec w  & =   0  \quad \text{in}  \quad \Omega \label{eq:correctorDiv} \\
+\vec w & =   \vec 0  \quad \text{on} \quad \partial \Omega \label{eq:correctorBC}
+\end{align}
+\onslide<3->  asd
+
+\begin{itemize}
+\footnotesize
+\item[]<4-> $u = u_{in}  \quad \text{in} \quad \Gamma_{inlet}$
+\end{itemize}
+
+\column{.5\textwidth} % Right column and width
+\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
+\onslide<1->
+ \begin{center}
+  \includegraphics[height=\textwidth]{images/aorta_blender.png}
+\caption{Aortic mesh }
+ \end{center}
+ \end{figure}
+\end{columns}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{The corrector field}
+\footnotesize
+
+To study the corrector in several scenarios> synthetic data, experimental phantom and healthy volunteers.
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{The corrector field}
+\footnotesize
+
+different data treatments> aliasing and noise. Undersampling
+
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+\section{Results}
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Results}
+\footnotesize
+
+results for the synthetic data. Comparison againts a perfect correction case with du.
+
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Results}
+\footnotesize
+
+results for experimental phantom
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Results}
+\footnotesize
+
+results in healthy volunteers
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+
+
+\section{Conclusions}
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Results}
+\footnotesize
+
+potential of the new quality parameter> analize real data. use the specificity for label zones with strong disagreedment. Use the field for create new inverse problems which can be used for further accelerations
+
+\end{frame}
+
+
+
+
+
+\begin{frame}
+\begin{center}
+\huge{Thank you for your time!}
+\end{center}
+\end{frame}
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+%\includegraphics<1>[height=4.5cm]{images/pat1.png}
+%\includegraphics<2>[height=4.5cm]{images/pat2.png}
+
+
+ 
+\end{document}
+