283 lines
6.2 KiB
TeX
Executable File
283 lines
6.2 KiB
TeX
Executable File
\documentclass[xcolor=dvipsnames]{beamer}
|
|
%\documentclass{beamer}
|
|
\usepackage[english]{babel}
|
|
%\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
|
|
\usepackage{multicol} % indice en 2 columnas
|
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{helvet}
|
|
\usefonttheme{serif}
|
|
%\usepackage{ccfonts} % Font family: Concrete Math
|
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
|
|
|
|
%\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
%\usepackage{movie15}
|
|
%\usepackage{media9}[2013/11/04]
|
|
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{graphicx}
|
|
\usepackage{multimedia}
|
|
\usepackage{media9}
|
|
|
|
%\usetheme{default}
|
|
%\usetheme{AnnArbor}
|
|
%\usetheme{Antibes}
|
|
%\usetheme{Bergen}
|
|
%\usetheme{Berkeley}
|
|
%\usetheme{Berlin}
|
|
%\usetheme{Boadilla}
|
|
%\usetheme{CambridgeUS}
|
|
%\usetheme{Copenhagen}
|
|
%\usetheme{Darmstadt}
|
|
%\usetheme{Dresden}
|
|
%\usetheme{Frankfurt}
|
|
%\usetheme{Goettingen}
|
|
%\usetheme{Hannover}
|
|
%\usetheme{Ilmenau}
|
|
%\usetheme{JuanLesPins}
|
|
%\usetheme{Luebeck}
|
|
%\usetheme{Madrid}
|
|
%\usetheme{Malmoe}
|
|
%\usetheme{Marburg}
|
|
%\usetheme{Montpellier}
|
|
%\usetheme{PaloAlto}
|
|
%\usetheme{Pittsburgh}
|
|
%\usetheme{Rochester}
|
|
%\usetheme{Singapore}
|
|
%\usetheme{Szeged}
|
|
\usetheme{Warsaw}
|
|
|
|
%\usecolortheme{albatross}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{beaver}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{beetle}
|
|
\usecolortheme{crane}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{dolphin}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{dove}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{fly}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{lily}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{orchid}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{rose}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{seagull}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{seahorse}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{whale}
|
|
%\usecolortheme{wolverine}
|
|
|
|
%\useoutertheme{infolines}
|
|
%\useoutertheme{miniframes}
|
|
%\useoutertheme{sidebar}
|
|
\useoutertheme{smoothbars}
|
|
%\useoutertheme{shadow}
|
|
%\useoutertheme{smoothtree}
|
|
%\useoutertheme{split}
|
|
%\useoutertheme{tree}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{amssymb,mathrsfs,amsmath,latexsym,amsthm,amsfonts}
|
|
\useinnertheme{rectangles}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{} % quitar simbolitos
|
|
|
|
|
|
\setbeamerfont{page number in head/foot}{size=\large}
|
|
\setbeamertemplate{footline}[frame number]
|
|
|
|
|
|
\title[A new mathematical model for verifying the Navier-Stokes compatibility of 4D flow MRI data]{ A new mathematical model for verifying the Navier-Stokes compatibility of 4D flow MRI data}
|
|
%\author[Jeremías Garay Labra]
|
|
%{Jeremías Garay Labra}
|
|
\institute[University of Groningen]
|
|
{
|
|
Bernoulli Institute\\
|
|
Faculty of Sciences and Engineering\\
|
|
University of Groningen\\[0.5cm]
|
|
%\includegraphics[height=1.5cm]{Imagenes/escudoU2014.pdf}
|
|
% \includegraphics[height=1cm]{Imagenes/fcfm.png} \\[0.5cm]
|
|
\texttt{Jeremías Garay Labra \\ \ j.e.garay.labra@rug.nl}
|
|
}
|
|
\date{\today}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{document}
|
|
\frame{\titlepage}
|
|
|
|
|
|
% \onslide<1->
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Index}
|
|
\tableofcontents
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{4D flow MRI}
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{4D flow MRI}
|
|
\begin{columns}[c]
|
|
\column{.55\textwidth} % Left column and width
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
|
|
4D flow MRI has been shown potential in the assesment of blood flow dynamics in heart and large arteries, allowing wide variety of options for visualization and quantification.
|
|
|
|
\column{.5\textwidth} % Right column and width
|
|
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{4D flow MRI}
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
Main limitation for its clinical applicability is the long scan times involved. Therefore, multiple strategies emerged in order to make acquisition faster, such as:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Navigator gating
|
|
\item modest spatial resolutions $ \sim (2.5 \times 2.5 \times 2.5 \ mm^3)$
|
|
\item partial data coverage
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
Typical quality estimators: SNR, VNR, peak flows/velocities, mass conservation (zero divergence)
|
|
|
|
We want to introduce a novel measure for quantify the quality of the 4D flow measurements, using the conservation of momentum of the flow (Navier-Stokes compatibility).
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{The corrector field}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{The corrector field}
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
|
|
We assume a perfect physical velocity field $\vec{u}$
|
|
\begin{eqnarray*}
|
|
\rho \frac{\partial \vec{u}}{\partial t} + \rho \big ( \vec{u} \cdot \nabla \big) \vec{u} - \mu \Delta \vec{u} + \nabla p = 0 \quad \text{in} \quad \Omega \label{eq:NSmom}
|
|
\end{eqnarray*}
|
|
|
|
And a corrector field $\vec{w}$ which satisfies:
|
|
|
|
\begin{align}
|
|
\vec{u} & \approx \vec{u}_{meas} + \vec{w} \quad \text{in} \quad \Omega \label{eq:corrector} \\
|
|
\nabla \cdot \vec w & = 0 \quad \text{in} \quad \Omega \label{eq:correctorDiv} \\
|
|
\vec w & = \vec 0 \quad \text{on} \quad \partial \Omega \label{eq:correctorBC}
|
|
\end{align}
|
|
|
|
$\vec{w}$ measures the level of agreedment of the 4D flow measures respect to the Navier-Stokes equations.
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Numerical tests}
|
|
\begin{columns}[c]
|
|
\column{.6\textwidth} % Left column and width
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
We tested the corrector using CFD simulations as a measurements, in the following testcases:
|
|
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item Womersley flow in a cilinder
|
|
\item Navier-Stokes simulations in an aortic mesh
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
Also perturbations were added into the measurements:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item velocity aliasing
|
|
\item additive noise
|
|
\item simulated k-space undersampling
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\column{.5\textwidth} % Right column and width
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\includegraphics[height=\textwidth]{images/aorta_blender.png}
|
|
\caption{Aortic mesh }
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Experiments}
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item We performed 4D flow measurements in a silicon aortic phantom
|
|
\item 4 healthy volunteers were scanned using a clinical standard 4D flow protocol.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Results}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Results}
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
|
|
results for the synthetic data. Comparison againts the perfect correction field: du.
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Results}
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
|
|
results for experimental phantom
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Results}
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
|
|
results in healthy volunteers
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Conclusions}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\frametitle{Conclusions and future}
|
|
\footnotesize
|
|
|
|
potential of the new quality parameter:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item analize real data
|
|
\item use the specificity for label zones with strong disagreedment
|
|
\item Use the field for create new inverse problems which can be used for further accelerations
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\huge{Thank you for your time!}
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%\includegraphics<1>[height=4.5cm]{images/pat1.png}
|
|
%\includegraphics<2>[height=4.5cm]{images/pat2.png}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{document}
|
|
|