mods
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd11326aa8
commit
6052587789
|
@ -404,9 +404,18 @@ Experiments using synthetic data
|
|||
%\end{frame}
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Numerical tests}
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
Results
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
|
||||
\onslide<1-> For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
|
||||
|
@ -415,14 +424,14 @@ Experiments using synthetic data
|
|||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_1.png}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (\infty,120\%)$. $\vec{w} \times 200$}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
|
||||
For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
|
||||
|
@ -431,7 +440,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
|
|||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_2.png}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (\infty,80\%)$. $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
|
||||
%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
@ -440,14 +449,14 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_3.png}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (10 \ dB,120\%)$. $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$}
|
||||
%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
@ -456,14 +465,14 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_4.png}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
|
||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (10 \ dB,80\%)$. $\vec{w} \times 4$}
|
||||
%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
@ -473,7 +482,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
|
@ -488,7 +497,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
|
@ -505,7 +514,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
|
||||
\frametitle{Undersampling}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
|
@ -520,20 +529,20 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{frame}
|
||||
\frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
|
||||
\footnotesize
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
\begin{center}
|
||||
\includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth]{images/undersampling_press.png}
|
||||
\caption{ \footnotesize Different undersampling rates for the channel}
|
||||
\end{center}
|
||||
\end{figure}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\end{frame}
|
||||
|
||||
%\begin{frame}
|
||||
% \frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
|
||||
%\footnotesize
|
||||
%
|
||||
%\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
|
||||
% \begin{center}
|
||||
% \includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth]{images/undersampling_press.png}
|
||||
%\caption{ \footnotesize Different undersampling rates for the channel}
|
||||
% \end{center}
|
||||
% \end{figure}
|
||||
%
|
||||
%
|
||||
%\end{frame}
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue