mods
This commit is contained in:
		@@ -404,9 +404,18 @@ Experiments using synthetic data
 | 
				
			|||||||
%\end{frame}
 | 
					%\end{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
%
 | 
					%
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 \frametitle{Numerical tests}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					\begin{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					Results
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					\end{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					\end{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
 | 
					 \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\onslide<1-> For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
					\onslide<1-> For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -415,14 +424,14 @@ Experiments using synthetic data
 | 
				
			|||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
 \begin{center}
 | 
					 \begin{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_1.png}
 | 
					  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_1.png}
 | 
				
			||||||
\caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
 | 
					\caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (\infty,120\%)$. $\vec{w} \times 200$}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{center}
 | 
					 \end{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{figure}
 | 
					 \end{figure}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\end{frame}
 | 
					\end{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
 | 
					 \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
					For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -431,7 +440,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 | 
				
			|||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
 \begin{center}
 | 
					 \begin{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_2.png}
 | 
					  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_2.png}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
 | 
					  \caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (\infty,80\%)$. $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 | 
				
			||||||
%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 | 
					%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{center}
 | 
					 \end{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{figure}
 | 
					 \end{figure}
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -440,14 +449,14 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
 | 
					 \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
					For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
 \begin{center}
 | 
					 \begin{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_3.png}
 | 
					  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_3.png}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
 | 
					  \caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (10 \ dB,120\%)$. $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$}
 | 
				
			||||||
%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 | 
					%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{center}
 | 
					 \end{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{figure}
 | 
					 \end{figure}
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -456,14 +465,14 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
 | 
					 \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
					For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_{ref} - \vec u_{meas}$
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
 \begin{center}
 | 
					 \begin{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_4.png}
 | 
					  \includegraphics[height=0.45\textwidth]{images/channel_ppt_4.png}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \caption{\small Fields for the channel in terms of (SNR,$venc$)}
 | 
					  \caption{\small Fields for the channel: $(SNR,venc) = (10 \ dB,80\%)$.  $\vec{w} \times 4$}
 | 
				
			||||||
%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 | 
					%\caption{\small Different perturbation scenarios. $(\infty , 120 \%)$: $\vec{w} \times 200$, $(10 \ dB , 120 \%)$: $\delta \vec{u}, \vec{w} \times 4$, rest: $\vec{w} \times 4$ }
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{center}
 | 
					 \end{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{figure}
 | 
					 \end{figure}
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -473,7 +482,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
 | 
					 \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -488,7 +497,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: aliasing and noise}
 | 
					 \frametitle{Aliasing and noise}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -505,7 +514,7 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
 | 
					 \frametitle{Undersampling}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
@@ -520,20 +529,20 @@ For comparison we defined a perfect corrector field as: $\delta \vec u = \vec u_
 | 
				
			|||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{frame}
 | 
					%\begin{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
 | 
					% \frametitle{Results for channel: undersampling}
 | 
				
			||||||
\footnotesize
 | 
					%\footnotesize
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					%
 | 
				
			||||||
\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
					%\begin{figure}[!hbtp]
 | 
				
			||||||
 \begin{center}
 | 
					% \begin{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
  \includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth]{images/undersampling_press.png}
 | 
					%  \includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth]{images/undersampling_press.png}
 | 
				
			||||||
\caption{ \footnotesize Different undersampling rates for the channel}
 | 
					%\caption{ \footnotesize Different undersampling rates for the channel}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{center}
 | 
					% \end{center}
 | 
				
			||||||
 \end{figure}
 | 
					% \end{figure}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					%
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					%
 | 
				
			||||||
\end{frame}
 | 
					%\end{frame}
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					%
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 
 | 
				
			|||||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user